What’s at stake in Trump’s fraud trial – and other civil cases

On the third day of his New York state civil trial this week on charges of fraudulently inflating the value of real estate assets, Donald Trump appeared to be getting restless.

At the noon break, he spoke angrily to reporters about how unfair the judge and trial were. Then he left the courthouse and flew back to his Florida residence.

Why We Wrote This

Former President Donald Trump’s attendance at a civil court case this week hints at the high legal stakes – and at how he can employ trials as part of his presidential campaign.

Mr. Trump’s departure was unsurprising. He does not have to attend the civil trial. It was his presence in the courtroom to begin with that may have been more remarkable – and indicative.

Mr. Trump’s biggest legal problems remain criminal cases on allegations of election interference and illegal retention of classified documents. But he also faces a series of civil lawsuits such as the New York fraud trial, which could cost him hundreds of millions of dollars, threaten the stability of his business empire, and cast a harsh light on some of his personal behavior.

Mr. Trump’s court appearance may be a preview of how he deals with his criminal and important civil trials to come – and will generate significant press coverage for him as he runs his presidential campaign.  

“He’s good ratings,” says legal expert Daniel Urman of Northeastern University. “He’s catnip to the press.”

Former President Donald Trump audibly groaned. He scribbled notes on pieces of paper, threw some away, and then muttered quietly to his lawyers. He appeared to shake his head and then threw up his hands.

It was the third day of Mr. Trump’s New York state civil trial this week on charges of fraudulently inflating the value of real estate assets, and he appeared to be getting restless. At the noon break, he spoke angrily to reporters about how unfair the judge and trial were. Then he left the courthouse, got on his jet, and flew back to his Florida residence, Mar-a-Lago.

Mr. Trump’s departure was unsurprising. He does not have to attend the civil trial, and he had already sat through hours of testimony. Judge Arthur Engoron has already ruled against him and his businesses on the case’s core fraud charge. The trial is now about six additional claims against Mr. Trump. 

Why We Wrote This

Former President Donald Trump’s attendance at a civil court case this week hints at the high legal stakes – and at how he can employ trials as part of his presidential campaign.

It was his presence in the courtroom to begin with that may have been more remarkable – and indicative of the lawsuit’s core challenge to Mr. Trump’s identity as a successful businessperson. Mr. Trump’s biggest legal problems remain criminal cases on allegations of election interference and illegal retention of classified documents. But he also faces a looming series of civil lawsuits such as the New York fraud trial, which could cost him hundreds of millions of dollars, threaten the stability of his business empire, and cast a harsh light on some of his personal behavior.

If nothing else, the civil trials add even more court dates to Mr. Trump’s already crammed legal agenda. Mr. Trump and his companies face the daunting logistical challenge of organizing and paying for legal representation in serious cases for months, if not years, to come. 

“This is like a hypothetical that a lot of law professors would reject. Imagine a person with this many pending legal actions,” says Daniel Urman, a professor of law and public policy at Northeastern University in Boston.

Craig Ruttle/AP

Former President Donald Trump speaks with journalists during a break from court proceedings in New York, Oct. 2, 2023.

Current and upcoming civil court cases  

Civil court cases are different from criminal counterparts in a number of ways. The punishment for losing a civil suit is not a prison sentence, as can be the case with criminal prosecutions. It is generally a monetary payment or a court injunction against engaging in a particular activity. In civil suits, plaintiffs establish their claims by a preponderance of the evidence, instead of the “guilt beyond a reasonable doubt” standard of a criminal trial.